What will the States do about the recommendations expressed to them by the Human Rights Council? These recommendations, according to the Council itself, “should be implemented primarily by the State concerned”. We at UPR Watch think this “implementation” is binding in nature since the following review cycle (2012-2016), if it is to take place, will focus precisely on the implementation of these recommendations.
Our Website offers a follow-up, country by country, of the implementation – or lack thereof – of the recommendations received and accepted by the states under review.
Without this implementation, the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) and the Human Rights Council would lose all credibility and all legitimacy. Without this implementation, the effective promotion and protection of the rights of “all members of the human family” would simply be negated. Indeed, the Council’s recommendations express a consensus between the international community and a given country in terms of rights protection within that State. Consequently, failure to act constitutes an “informed” refusal to guarantee fundamental rights protection.